(Not so much directed at you, but more latching on to what you said.) They all do the same thing: Try to make moves that put them ahead of the curve against New England (and I'm sure it's not limited to the AFC East and the Patriots. I'm sure GB inspires similar behaviour in the NFC North, and other succesful teams have done the same at times.)
Over and over teams in the AFC East have made splashy moves that were meant to close the gap, that in reality only lead to making the gap bigger eventually. Jets spent big, got into cap trouble and had to purge to get back on track. Same thing seems to have happened to Miami allready, and the Bills even before Rex Ryan came along were making desperate moves (Sammy Watkins) and have only continued to do so with him there.
It works, sort of, for a year or 2, and then the bad contracts they piled up start weighing them down and they have to make tough decisions and/or rebuild. Free agency is cool and all, but the most succesful teams have all become succesful through drafting and developing and consistency.
If you have a coach/GM in place for a longer period you keep bringing in similar type players, these players learn the same things, and help eachother learn and grow in this 1 system. It's one of those things where it's actually easier to keep it going then it is to start it up. For teams that switch coaches and GM's often it just means a constant switching of systems, constant switching of ideal players, never any consistency in what players know and can teach eachother.
And that's what kills most teams. They just go through these cycles of being in a bad state financially and play wise, purging, starting to rebuild, getting close and over reaching and descending again due to bad contracts and/or bad coaching. Depending on if the problem is more due to coaching or more due to player management a team might be able to make a quick turnaround, but actually going out and completely breaking the cycle and starting to have both coaching and player management in order and creatign stability is what seperates the Steelers of the world from the Browns.
It's not a reach to say it starts with owners as well. Smart owners know who to hire and when to put their foot down abotu things, contract wise or any other. But there's plenty of owners who don't seem to have a clue about football and make bad decisions in who they hire and who they fire and how to direct their management to guide all these things. It's no coincedence that several teams have football families who have been able to sustain relative success for long periods and there's teams that seem to always have some kind of change going on.
In the end my personal opinion is that at least where it concerns the Dolphins and Jets that the owners are just clueless and put pressure on the organization to deliver, which leads to bad decision making, which leads to spectacular meltdowns instead of teams just being mediocre for a time. The Bills had Ralph Wilson for ages, and he was a football institution that knew very well how to run a succesful football team, but you have to wonder just how in control he was these last few years of his life when the Bills seemed to perpetually struggle. The Pegula's seem to have fallen for Rex's bluster and hype so I personally think they started off on the wrong foot* (and should have stuck with Schwartz), but I wouldn't lump them in with the first 2 owners just yet.
(* unintended Rex Ryan foot joke ftw)
- - - Updated - - -
Well then. Not only is Matt HAsselbeck starting instead of Luck, but Hasselbeck is sick still and had IV's as late as this afternoon. Says energy levels are very low and he;s not sure he'll make it 4 quarters.
I think that's a good thing. I mean, it's only fair that both teams play without a QB this game.